Answering Humanist's Accusations Against the Bible
HUMANISTS CLAIMS ABOUT: Inaccurate Statements About History
The Bibles false statements about history also bolster the Humanist position. Historians and other scholars have exposed many of the Bibles claims as historically inaccurate.
History and the Old Testament
Historians have long known that the biblical story of a worldwide flood is a myth. For instance, Andrew White says nineteenth-century Egyptologists found that Egypt had a flourishing civilization long before Noah, and no flood had ever interrupted it. [White, Vol. I, p. 257.]
Before we get started, notice the source of this accusation. If you have been reading these chapters in sequence, you will recognize our old "friend" Andrew White. He is a source who has proven to be unreliable and inaccurate. (If you don't know about Andrew White, click here.)
The humanists claim historians know Noah's Flood is a myth. However, that is not true. Many historians, as well as geologists, recognize there was a flood and that it is an important part of our history. Who is right? That is a major topic, bigger than we can cover in one web page.
Was there a global flood? Yes. If you take the time to look at the evidence... ALL of the evidence... without predetermining the answer you want to get. You will find the evidence supporting a global flood is overwhelming. Here are a couple of online resources:
Brief Article Listing a Few of the Evidences for a Global Flood
Longer Article with More Evidence for a Global Flood
Online Videos:
Can Certain Geological Features be Explained by a Flood?
Here are a few examples of wwhat you’ll see in the above resources. They include evidences such as:
No. This is a common myth based on a list from about 280 BC. It is a list of pharaohs and giving the number of years they reigned as recorded by the historian Manetho. Modern historians assumed each pharaoh ruled one after another. This resulted in a very long history for ancient Egypt. However, there are some major problems with this list:
But There Numerous Problems With That
1) We now know there were geographically different Egyptian kingdoms at various times— they are known as the Upper Kingdom, and the Middle Kingdom (Golden Age) or Lower Kingdom. At times there were multiple Pharaohs ruling in separate kingdoms at the same time. So not all names on the list were consecutive.
2) At times fathers and sons reigned together for a long time. We see this common practice in other ancient civilizations. So some of the names and durations are simultaneous, not consecutive.
3) Egyptian dating is thought to be based on dynasties, but there are overlapping dynasties.
4) The purpose of the list created by Manethos was not to provide an accurate record. Its purpose was to glorify Egypt. "Called Aigyptiaka (On things Egyptian) it was written for the new Ptolemaic ruling dynasty, just as a near contemporary Babylonian, Berossos, wrote a history of Babylon for the new Seleukid dynasty. Each historian was setting out to prove that his country was the oldest, a matter of prestige to the new Macedonian rulers." - Quote from the World History web site.
5) The list created by Manethos is inconsistent, repeats pharaohs, omits some rulers, and different copies of the Manethos list conflict with each other. "As his work survives, it is hopelessly garbled in places. But, despite all the problems associated with dynastic divisions, Manethos work is so ingrained in Egyptology that it is now impossible to get rid of it." - Quote from the World History web site.
6) Egyptian chronology has been found to be inconsistent with ancient Assyrian and Hittite records, another indication it is not accurate.
Here is a link to an article that discusses some of the other problems and issues with dating Ancient Egypt. Yes, there are many more: dating Ancient Egypt (click here)
Although the commonly held belief among non-historians is that Egyptian civilization goes back to 5,000 BC, that belief is based on myth unsupported by the historical evidence.
Thinking that Noah's flood did not happen is just wishful thinking on the part of evolutionists and humanists. Billions of years, without a global flood, is required for evolution to be true. However, both the Bible and the physical evidence support the fact that Noah's global flood was real.
The book of Exodus claims to contain a historical record of the escape of the Israelites from slavery in Egypt. But historians and archaeologists have been unable to verify any of the events described in the book. No known Egyptian records refer to the biblical Moses, the devastating plagues God supposedly inflicted on the country, the escape of the Hebrew slaves, or the drowning of the Egyptian army. Further, White tells us the records contained on Egyptian monuments show that the pharaoh ruling at the time of the alleged escape of the Jews was certainly not overwhelmed in the Red Sea.
Does a lack of ancient records prove that something did not happen? Let's find out... click here...
Many people, when they die, will stand before Jesus and say:
Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles? - Matthew 7:22
And Jesus will say to them:
I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness. - Matthew 7:23
Get your Bible out and read Matthew 7:21-23. These are some of the most frightening verses in the Bible.
They describe people who believe with all their heart that they are saved. They have no doubt that they know Jesus and they've done many great things that prove this is true. Put Jesus says, 'Depart from me...' He doesn't know them.
Are you truly trusting Jesus? Scripture says to examine yourself to see if you are in the faith (2 Corinthians 13:5). Have you done that?
Do you read your Bible regularly? Do you fear false teaching? Are you growing in your obedience to God? Are you growing in your understanding of what God wants? Do you regularly share the good news about Jesus with others?